We have received an IM from a reader to the effect that Prokofy Neva has gotten into trouble on her main account, being A/R'd for "harassment > Defamation of individuals or groups" for her blog entries containing lies about inworld persons or their RL entities. Normally LL doesn't do anything about content on 3rd party servers, so we're not sure if this is accurate. We do know that she's been abuse reported with Typepad by a number of people, including IntLib. However it is possibly more likely that she has gotten in trouble for spamming links to defamatory blog posts in inworld group chat, possibly to Concierge Information Group chat, or some other group chat, in which someone abuse reported her for that. We have it on good authority that CIG chat gets shut down by the Lindens pretty regularly in response to Prok defaming and attacking others. Perhaps they finally got sick of it.
Monday, September 21, 2009
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
A Liar Lying about Lying Lies
Apparently we are getting under Proks skin. In todays blog she has pulled a Nixon, stating, "I am not a liar."
Generally, when someone writes such a TL;DR post to try to turn around and once again lying about IntLibber, claiming he is the one lying, or a paranoid lunatic, etc... when in fact she means me, it is in fact she is the one who is lying, repeatedly and often, to the public, to the Woodbury administration, to Linden Lab.
I am not IntLibber, I am ProkChokedMyChickenItWas Delicioso, a completely distinct and different person. She is continuing to try to claim that my writing is Int's. This is utterly false of course.
She goes on to talk about code words being allegedly used in search as euphemisms for certain fetishes and justifies her opinion by claiming to be "transgendered in SL without being x-rated". She forgets that her regular language (fucktard, asswipe, dickweed, shithead, etc) full of expletives makes her avatar x-rated without any nudity. Then lets look at the transgendered avie: she allegedly is not transgendered in RL, but her avie is transgendered? Theres a misrepresentation, a lie right there, as if having a male avatar makes her transgendered. Puhleeze, she insults all the people who really are transgendered with such a flippant claim to authority without real experience.
Prok has been emailing the Woodbury administration on a daily basis attempting to mess up Int's academic future, without any evidence that he has ever done anything against her, yet turns around and rants about how wrong it is to attack people in RL. She posted photos from SLCC's party bus event on Second Citizen and asked members of the forum there to identify people's RL buttcracks with their avatar name. Her hypocrisy and clear lack of relationship with the truth are evident to any sane person.
One poster to her piece says, "You aren't lying, you are crazy." This makes an important point. The insane cannot be found guilty of libel because the insane honestly believe the delusions they see as their reality. Our posts here have always left that possibility open: she's either a liar or a nut. The fact she lives across the street from Bellevue's mental hospital in NYC, possibly being housed there by them for easy access to care, lends credence to that possibility. Her denial of having mental health issues are what one expects to hear from the insane. It's always everybody else in the world that is nuts, right?
A definition of insanity is to have a perception of reality that departs markedly from the mean of the general population. Cursory reading of her blog demonstrates this is a reasonable description of Prok's perception of reality. Another definition of insanity is to keep banging your head against the wall, expecting a different result. Proks response to people she doesn't like, and even those who try to help her, has always been the same: rude offensiveness and insults, parcel bans, forfeiture of rent, defamation, libel, etc. yet she continues to rant on and on as if continuing to bash her head against the wall in this way will some day have a different result.
By all intents and purposes Prokofy is clinically insane, so it might be accurate to say she's not lying but only by reason of insanity, much like John Hinckley wasn't guilty of attempted assasination of Ronald Reagan.
Generally, when someone writes such a TL;DR post to try to turn around and once again lying about IntLibber, claiming he is the one lying, or a paranoid lunatic, etc... when in fact she means me, it is in fact she is the one who is lying, repeatedly and often, to the public, to the Woodbury administration, to Linden Lab.
I am not IntLibber, I am ProkChokedMyChickenItWas Delicioso, a completely distinct and different person. She is continuing to try to claim that my writing is Int's. This is utterly false of course.
She goes on to talk about code words being allegedly used in search as euphemisms for certain fetishes and justifies her opinion by claiming to be "transgendered in SL without being x-rated". She forgets that her regular language (fucktard, asswipe, dickweed, shithead, etc) full of expletives makes her avatar x-rated without any nudity. Then lets look at the transgendered avie: she allegedly is not transgendered in RL, but her avie is transgendered? Theres a misrepresentation, a lie right there, as if having a male avatar makes her transgendered. Puhleeze, she insults all the people who really are transgendered with such a flippant claim to authority without real experience.
Prok has been emailing the Woodbury administration on a daily basis attempting to mess up Int's academic future, without any evidence that he has ever done anything against her, yet turns around and rants about how wrong it is to attack people in RL. She posted photos from SLCC's party bus event on Second Citizen and asked members of the forum there to identify people's RL buttcracks with their avatar name. Her hypocrisy and clear lack of relationship with the truth are evident to any sane person.
One poster to her piece says, "You aren't lying, you are crazy." This makes an important point. The insane cannot be found guilty of libel because the insane honestly believe the delusions they see as their reality. Our posts here have always left that possibility open: she's either a liar or a nut. The fact she lives across the street from Bellevue's mental hospital in NYC, possibly being housed there by them for easy access to care, lends credence to that possibility. Her denial of having mental health issues are what one expects to hear from the insane. It's always everybody else in the world that is nuts, right?
A definition of insanity is to have a perception of reality that departs markedly from the mean of the general population. Cursory reading of her blog demonstrates this is a reasonable description of Prok's perception of reality. Another definition of insanity is to keep banging your head against the wall, expecting a different result. Proks response to people she doesn't like, and even those who try to help her, has always been the same: rude offensiveness and insults, parcel bans, forfeiture of rent, defamation, libel, etc. yet she continues to rant on and on as if continuing to bash her head against the wall in this way will some day have a different result.
By all intents and purposes Prokofy is clinically insane, so it might be accurate to say she's not lying but only by reason of insanity, much like John Hinckley wasn't guilty of attempted assasination of Ronald Reagan.
Monday, September 14, 2009
Policy WRT Links To Proks Blog
While we will report on Proks activities and blogging, lies and defamation, lack of journalistic ethics of one Catherine A Fitzpatrick, and the antics of the few remaining kool-aid sipping Prokanistas, we will not provide links back to Prok's blog. The intent of course is to not help Prok's google ranking in any way.
Conversely we encourage people to add links to Prokofy Watch to as many different websites as possible to help boost our google ranking. Thats cash.
Conversely we encourage people to add links to Prokofy Watch to as many different websites as possible to help boost our google ranking. Thats cash.
Woodbury Sandbox Traffic Hits 12,000
Woodburys new peak for this year in traffic in its sandbox sim. Counting traffic in the other two sims, WU totals over 20k daily traffic, far higher than any other virtual campus in SL: higher than Bowling Green, Texas Tech, U of Western Australia, UNC, DePaul U, U of S Denmark, even virtual universities like Rockcliffe, Glasgow Caledonian U, Elon U, etc.
Searching for "university", WU is only ranked higher by a sandbox that uses bots to fake traffic and some european tourist sims that happen to have the word 'university' in their parcel description.
Suck on that one, Prokofy, DW, bladyblue, cocoanut, Joshua, and all the other naysayers and doomslayers on the grid who think they can define what WU is and is not. WU is not what you claim, WU is the leader in what is actually important in education: reaching out to students and potential students. So Pathfinder, we think its time we proved our point.
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Prokken vs Chicken
All the ranting from Prok about her chickens, which she is documented as leaving out in public, unsecured, unprotected, to be damaged by any sim physics that happened along reminds us of some antivirus programmers a few years ago who intentionally released worms and other malware into the public in order to promote and sell their security software. As prok would say, this is a typical leninist conspiracy, using dialectical conflict to attack innocents and gain public support.
Until then, Prok had attacked the sionChicken and its creator regularly, as well as their users, farmers, etc for lag and other issues. She found out that IntLib had helped sion reduce the lag the chickens produced, which made it more feasible for people to farm them without being declared griefers by estate owners and Linden alike. e-agriculture seems to be supporting the grid economy in the face of an otherwise serious economic downturn, and Prok wanted in on the cash flow.
So she saw attacking Woodbury and their estate owner, IntLib, as a means of severing his popularity in that market. How to do so? By leaving some chickens of her own out in public to be victimized by sim physics and individuals having nothing to do with IntLib who consider chickens to be griefer devices, so she could then blame IntLib for the resulting damages.
Thing is the public hasn't bought the big lie Prok has tried to promote. People are leaving her sims in droves, her tier avatar, Random Unsung, is in billing suspension, and IntLibs "Sorens Farmers Market" is renting at 100% occupancy.
A new anti-virus commercial mirrors this episode in Prokian Dialectics:
Until then, Prok had attacked the sionChicken and its creator regularly, as well as their users, farmers, etc for lag and other issues. She found out that IntLib had helped sion reduce the lag the chickens produced, which made it more feasible for people to farm them without being declared griefers by estate owners and Linden alike. e-agriculture seems to be supporting the grid economy in the face of an otherwise serious economic downturn, and Prok wanted in on the cash flow.
So she saw attacking Woodbury and their estate owner, IntLib, as a means of severing his popularity in that market. How to do so? By leaving some chickens of her own out in public to be victimized by sim physics and individuals having nothing to do with IntLib who consider chickens to be griefer devices, so she could then blame IntLib for the resulting damages.
Thing is the public hasn't bought the big lie Prok has tried to promote. People are leaving her sims in droves, her tier avatar, Random Unsung, is in billing suspension, and IntLibs "Sorens Farmers Market" is renting at 100% occupancy.
A new anti-virus commercial mirrors this episode in Prokian Dialectics:
Friday, September 11, 2009
Harshing Falsely on Emerald
Unable to go more than a day without posting a piece full of misrepresentations and lies about somebody or something, Prok decided to yesterday harsh on the Emerald viewer again, with a long list of claimed features which are "criminal" or "terroristic" or whatever. A commenter quickly responded by giving the facts about the features and their function, totally dispelling Prok's claims.
This woman sounds more and more like one of those pre-war neocons who kept insisting that Saddam had WMD no matter what the UN said, and pushed and lied their way into getting this country into a war.
This woman sounds more and more like one of those pre-war neocons who kept insisting that Saddam had WMD no matter what the UN said, and pushed and lied their way into getting this country into a war.
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Hyprokisy
"If we don't believe in freedom of expression for
people we despise, we don't believe in it at all."
-- Noam Chomsky
Noam Chomsky is one of these leftie human rights proponents that, had she not become a Mugged Democrat, Prok would still be noshing with in the NYC internationalist scene. She appears to be the editor, or was the editor, of a show broadcast by US propaganda radio stations. With pretensions to being some sort of journalist, you would think she would put Freedom of Speech as her highest ethic.
While she cries for the Afghan fixer/translator killed in the crossfire of a battle between British commandos and the Taliban who held the Afghan and his journalist client hostage, she ignores the censorship of the freedom of speech organized on a global scale by Rohde's employer, the New York Times, which made deals with Al Jazeera (apologists and promoters of terrorists), and even bribed Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales to censor the wikipage on Rohde, leading to a huge controversy among wiki editors. The claim is that somehow keeping his kidnapping hush hush saved Rohde's life, without providing any proof.
One wonders how much ransom NYT was preparing to pay, or what the financially troubled NYT paid Al Jazeera for its silence. Allegedly the Taliban were demanding $25 million and the release of 10 Gitmo prisoners for his release.
Rohde made his name attacking US policies on POWs, its treatment of prisoners in Abu Graib, Gitmo, and elswhere. He was clearly helping the Taliban cause, so why did they turn against him? His writing alone freed more Taliban from US jails than his kidnappers hoped to regain. The lead kidnapper, Siraj Haqqani, son of a high Taliban official, even killed a messenger sent under agreement to check on Rohde's status in good faith.
The fact is that, in the end, a life was lost, the Afghan interpreter/fixer died while Rohde lived. The fixer likely should have not gone out first and said "Journalist! Journalist!" in a likely poorly understood Afghan accent, any more than a Palestinian fixer should go out when a westerner is rescued from Hamas or Hezbollah by Israeli troops.
So the truth was suppressed, speech was censored, and a man still died as a result. A lose-lose all around.
What is more, ABC News has lied about the story, claiming that Rohde escaped by himself and that his driver was too scared to attempt escape and his fate was unknown. Now this claim that his driver died at the hands of British commandos comes out. Which story are we to believe?
Sounds like changing propaganda story lines as the credibility of one falls through, a new lie is created.
This is akin to Proks tactics on her own blog, posting lies about people and groups, and changing her story as people call her BS, but otherwise censoring comments critical of her specious connection to truth.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)