Taming of the Prok?

We have received an IM from a reader to the effect that Prokofy Neva has gotten into trouble on her main account, being A/R'd for "harassment > Defamation of individuals or groups" for her blog entries containing lies about inworld persons or their RL entities. Normally LL doesn't do anything about content on 3rd party servers, so we're not sure if this is accurate. We do know that she's been abuse reported with Typepad by a number of people, including IntLib. However it is possibly more likely that she has gotten in trouble for spamming links to defamatory blog posts in inworld group chat, possibly to Concierge Information Group chat, or some other group chat, in which someone abuse reported her for that. We have it on good authority that CIG chat gets shut down by the Lindens pretty regularly in response to Prok defaming and attacking others. Perhaps they finally got sick of it.

A Liar Lying about Lying Lies

Apparently we are getting under Proks skin. In todays blog she has pulled a Nixon, stating, "I am not a liar."



Generally, when someone writes such a TL;DR post to try to turn around and once again lying about IntLibber, claiming he is the one lying, or a paranoid lunatic, etc... when in fact she means me, it is in fact she is the one who is lying, repeatedly and often, to the public, to the Woodbury administration, to Linden Lab.

I am not IntLibber, I am ProkChokedMyChickenItWas Delicioso, a completely distinct and different person. She is continuing to try to claim that my writing is Int's. This is utterly false of course.

She goes on to talk about code words being allegedly used in search as euphemisms for certain fetishes and justifies her opinion by claiming to be "transgendered in SL without being x-rated". She forgets that her regular language (fucktard, asswipe, dickweed, shithead, etc) full of expletives makes her avatar x-rated without any nudity. Then lets look at the transgendered avie: she allegedly is not transgendered in RL, but her avie is transgendered? Theres a misrepresentation, a lie right there, as if having a male avatar makes her transgendered. Puhleeze, she insults all the people who really are transgendered with such a flippant claim to authority without real experience.

Prok has been emailing the Woodbury administration on a daily basis attempting to mess up Int's academic future, without any evidence that he has ever done anything against her, yet turns around and rants about how wrong it is to attack people in RL. She posted photos from SLCC's party bus event on Second Citizen and asked members of the forum there to identify people's RL buttcracks with their avatar name. Her hypocrisy and clear lack of relationship with the truth are evident to any sane person.

One poster to her piece says, "You aren't lying, you are crazy." This makes an important point. The insane cannot be found guilty of libel because the insane honestly believe the delusions they see as their reality. Our posts here have always left that possibility open: she's either a liar or a nut. The fact she lives across the street from Bellevue's mental hospital in NYC, possibly being housed there by them for easy access to care, lends credence to that possibility. Her denial of having mental health issues are what one expects to hear from the insane. It's always everybody else in the world that is nuts, right?

A definition of insanity is to have a perception of reality that departs markedly from the mean of the general population. Cursory reading of her blog demonstrates this is a reasonable description of Prok's perception of reality. Another definition of insanity is to keep banging your head against the wall, expecting a different result. Proks response to people she doesn't like, and even those who try to help her, has always been the same: rude offensiveness and insults, parcel bans, forfeiture of rent, defamation, libel, etc. yet she continues to rant on and on as if continuing to bash her head against the wall in this way will some day have a different result.

By all intents and purposes Prokofy is clinically insane, so it might be accurate to say she's not lying but only by reason of insanity, much like John Hinckley wasn't guilty of attempted assasination of Ronald Reagan.

Policy WRT Links To Proks Blog

While we will report on Proks activities and blogging, lies and defamation, lack of journalistic ethics of one Catherine A Fitzpatrick, and the antics of the few remaining kool-aid sipping Prokanistas, we will not provide links back to Prok's blog. The intent of course is to not help Prok's google ranking in any way.

Conversely we encourage people to add links to Prokofy Watch to as many different websites as possible to help boost our google ranking. Thats cash.

Woodbury Sandbox Traffic Hits 12,000

Woodburys new peak for this year in traffic in its sandbox sim. Counting traffic in the other two sims, WU totals over 20k daily traffic, far higher than any other virtual campus in SL: higher than Bowling Green, Texas Tech, U of Western Australia, UNC, DePaul U, U of S Denmark, even virtual universities like Rockcliffe, Glasgow Caledonian U, Elon U, etc.

Searching for "university", WU is only ranked higher by a sandbox that uses bots to fake traffic and some european tourist sims that happen to have the word 'university' in their parcel description.

Suck on that one, Prokofy, DW, bladyblue, cocoanut, Joshua, and all the other naysayers and doomslayers on the grid who think they can define what WU is and is not. WU is not what you claim, WU is the leader in what is actually important in education: reaching out to students and potential students. So Pathfinder, we think its time we proved our point.

Prokken vs Chicken

All the ranting from Prok about her chickens, which she is documented as leaving out in public, unsecured, unprotected, to be damaged by any sim physics that happened along reminds us of some antivirus programmers a few years ago who intentionally released worms and other malware into the public in order to promote and sell their security software. As prok would say, this is a typical leninist conspiracy, using dialectical conflict to attack innocents and gain public support.

Until then, Prok had attacked the sionChicken and its creator regularly, as well as their users, farmers, etc for lag and other issues. She found out that IntLib had helped sion reduce the lag the chickens produced, which made it more feasible for people to farm them without being declared griefers by estate owners and Linden alike. e-agriculture seems to be supporting the grid economy in the face of an otherwise serious economic downturn, and Prok wanted in on the cash flow.

So she saw attacking Woodbury and their estate owner, IntLib, as a means of severing his popularity in that market. How to do so? By leaving some chickens of her own out in public to be victimized by sim physics and individuals having nothing to do with IntLib who consider chickens to be griefer devices, so she could then blame IntLib for the resulting damages.

Thing is the public hasn't bought the big lie Prok has tried to promote. People are leaving her sims in droves, her tier avatar, Random Unsung, is in billing suspension, and IntLibs "Sorens Farmers Market" is renting at 100% occupancy.

A new anti-virus commercial mirrors this episode in Prokian Dialectics:

Harshing Falsely on Emerald

Unable to go more than a day without posting a piece full of misrepresentations and lies about somebody or something, Prok decided to yesterday harsh on the Emerald viewer again, with a long list of claimed features which are "criminal" or "terroristic" or whatever. A commenter quickly responded by giving the facts about the features and their function, totally dispelling Prok's claims.

This woman sounds more and more like one of those pre-war neocons who kept insisting that Saddam had WMD no matter what the UN said, and pushed and lied their way into getting this country into a war.

Hyprokisy

"If we don't believe in freedom of expression for
people we despise, we don't believe in it at all."
-- Noam Chomsky

Noam Chomsky is one of these leftie human rights proponents that, had she not become a Mugged Democrat, Prok would still be noshing with in the NYC internationalist scene. She appears to be the editor, or was the editor, of a show broadcast by US propaganda radio stations. With pretensions to being some sort of journalist, you would think she would put Freedom of Speech as her highest ethic.

While she cries for the Afghan fixer/translator killed in the crossfire of a battle between British commandos and the Taliban who held the Afghan and his journalist client hostage, she ignores the censorship of the freedom of speech organized on a global scale by Rohde's employer, the New York Times, which made deals with Al Jazeera (apologists and promoters of terrorists), and even bribed Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales to censor the wikipage on Rohde, leading to a huge controversy among wiki editors. The claim is that somehow keeping his kidnapping hush hush saved Rohde's life, without providing any proof.

One wonders how much ransom NYT was preparing to pay, or what the financially troubled NYT paid Al Jazeera for its silence. Allegedly the Taliban were demanding $25 million and the release of 10 Gitmo prisoners for his release.

Rohde made his name attacking US policies on POWs, its treatment of prisoners in Abu Graib, Gitmo, and elswhere. He was clearly helping the Taliban cause, so why did they turn against him? His writing alone freed more Taliban from US jails than his kidnappers hoped to regain. The lead kidnapper, Siraj Haqqani, son of a high Taliban official, even killed a messenger sent under agreement to check on Rohde's status in good faith.

The fact is that, in the end, a life was lost, the Afghan interpreter/fixer died while Rohde lived. The fixer likely should have not gone out first and said "Journalist! Journalist!" in a likely poorly understood Afghan accent, any more than a Palestinian fixer should go out when a westerner is rescued from Hamas or Hezbollah by Israeli troops.

So the truth was suppressed, speech was censored, and a man still died as a result. A lose-lose all around.

What is more, ABC News has lied about the story, claiming that Rohde escaped by himself and that his driver was too scared to attempt escape and his fate was unknown. Now this claim that his driver died at the hands of British commandos comes out. Which story are we to believe?

Sounds like changing propaganda story lines as the credibility of one falls through, a new lie is created.

This is akin to Proks tactics on her own blog, posting lies about people and groups, and changing her story as people call her BS, but otherwise censoring comments critical of her specious connection to truth.

Prok Needs to Learn to Rap Chop

I am sure everyone here is familliar with infomercial huckster Vince Offer, of ShamWOW and Slap-Chop fame. You've either seen his ads on tv, or heard about the talk radio tiff between him and huckster Billy Mays (RIP), or about Vince's other claims to fame: Having won a suit against the Church of Scientology (always good to earn him fans from /b/tards), or having put the smack down on a prostitute who bit his tongue and wouldn't let go.

His ads have been remixed with autotune beauty in YouTUBE videos as "Rap Chop" and "Jam WOW". Rather than suing the remixing DJ for copyright infringement, Vince got smart, he endorsed the videos and had them recut for release AS ADVERTISEMENTS. This obviously greatly upped his Q rating among the young and hip who are not normally sold by infomercials, and has expanded his sales via the viral marketing medium of YouTUBE.

Many other companies are marketing to the young crowd by real or fake viral video efforts, either by coopting an existing viral video of their product, or producing one as an astroturf effort while disavowing association (particularly when the corporation has an older audience that doesnt 'get' what might be edgy content in a viral video.

Prokofy, we feel, is in a similar situation: if she were smart, she'd take advantage of the fact that she was so popular with the /b/tard and goon market segment in SL, and seek to market to them. She should welcome group members from Woodbury, from W-Hat, and from any other group that obsesses so much about her.

Unfortunately Prok is not smart, she is driven by her emotions, she sees what she believes and not the reverse. When someone asks for politeness, she gives the typical New Yorkers "Fuck off!" response. When someone expresses affection for her and her company, she says "Get away from me you creep!"

Because after all, someone so toxic and negative has to hate herself so much she cannot possibly believe that people would like her unless they were messed up. She is inherently unable to coopt the viral internet culture that has coopted her image and her memes of leninist conspiracies and technocommunism into jokes. She certainly cannot stand being the butt of jokes, being unable to not take her self seriously.

This is the difference between her and IntLibber: Int has learned to enjoy the lulz, even when its at his own expense. Prok can't. She is a troll of hate, while /b/ doesnt hate, it does things for the lulz. Doing things for hate is taking things seriously, and nothing is more non-/b/ than the srs bsns of hating things. Prok is the true internet hate machine. She cannot coopt that which she hates, so she will continue banning everyone she attacks and hates on, and expanding her failure along the way.

Prok Continues to Libel WU

You can always tell when a topic has Proks skirts in a bunch, she blathers on and on so much the content must be counted in column-feet rather than column-inches. Woodbury is evidently not keeping up its end, as her columns about it no longer rival her three column-feet length she dedicates to talking about opensim, OS clients, or Terra Nova blog writers. However she makes a fair stab at continuing the libel, though she seems to go off course midlength in a digression documenting how poorly she services the Russian customers she had recently but lost when she pissed them off with her petty-fascist policies.

Now, she tries to claim the Woodbury U members in SL are not creative, aside from the fact that they rebuild the entirety of their three sims every few months. Last month it was Red Square in Metaversity sim and a varied residential neighborhood in Longcat. This month Metaversity is building an orientation center for new Woodbury students joining the inworld activities, while Longcat hosts a submarine base and ICBM silo.

Woodburyland sim continues to be the most popular educational sandbox in SL, despite certain Lindens repeatedly taking the sandbox's parcel listing out of search. All the WU sims remain the most popular educational sims in SL, demonstrating that a living laboratory that caters to the interests of its users is always going to be a more important educational location than an empty sim-mausoleum full of reproductions of RL campus buildings named after dead rich trustees.

Prok hates the idea of students driving and shaping their education. She is a preacher type, who believes the hoi polloi must be 'saved' by enlightened instruction from authorities on high for their own good. That model of 'education' doesn't work anymore, as if it ever really did.

Prok Continues to Shag on Shang

Loathe to let a topic go, it appears Prokofy is looking here for topics to write about. She has expanded on her one line rip on Caledon proprietor Desmond Shang to rip into him with a full TL;DR post here.

Desmond has no trouble smacking her back in the comments. The drama is thick in this comedy gold. Apparently Prok's conspiracy radar is in full borkification mode and completely distorted every fact in an email Desmond sent her.

Prok's behavior reminds me of my own dear Russian great grand babushka, as steely an old harridan as ever could be found upon the steppes. She always made it clear to you that your behavior was substandard and if it was up to her you would have long since been left out in the snow bank as an infant for the wolves. Of course, Prok's not Russian, she's Irish, but I suppose the same sort of toxically negative cancerous personality can be found in the peat-huts of old Ireland.

Anywho, the crazy cat lady's toxo plasmosis seems to remain in full force.

Amateur Hour in Prok-land

Today, in a post having absolutely nothing to do with him, Prokofy ripped on Desmond Shang, proprietor/estate guvnah of Caledon's estates, which are a fine group of well manicured sims themed on the victorian/steampunk era, in her very first sentence:

One thing that makes SL unpleasant is the small-minded smugy and petty little burghers (like Desmond) that you find there -- and worse, the small-minded wannabee burghers.

While we might find ourselves in the unpleasant situation of agreeing with Proks opinion of Desmond only because of his role in banning Woodbury University members from his sims and trying to get Carl Metropolitan to ban them from NCI (an attempt that failed), he has in the past seemed to be a decent if stiff gent. We were truly shocked he would take such initiative against Woodbury when we've had nothing to do with his sims in any way. Perhaps the NCI teachers who teach at Oxbridge who happen to be WU members got under his skin for some reason, failing to hew to his ideas of proper victorian RP language. We don't know, but hope we could talk with him about it at some point.

What we do find amusing though is that Desmond has been one of the few people who hasn't yet declared Prokofy *batshit insane*, and has even stood up for her anti-WU jihad attitudes and propensity for guilt by association and spouting about 'leninist conspiracies'.

He certainly doesn't deserve Prok slamming him like that. Then again, in her mind, he FAILED at getting WU banned from NCI, or getting Carl to do so, so in her Dr. No-like mental machinations, he evidently doesn't serve her any further use and must be punished with public verbal thrashings to get him to perform properly.

"Toss him into the tank of angry sea bass!" she says in mad and diabolical over-arched tones.

Desmond, mate, if ye read this, be it known we feel for ye.

It is becoming clear that Prok is picking off her hench-men one by one. Carl failed and worse yet, publicly apologized to his victims for failing, so she spanks him down. Now shes spanking Desmond for failing to properly motivate Carl. Who shall be next? Bladiblu? Coco? We look forward to the next shoe falling in gleeful anticipation. Who will fail Prok next?

Proks Alt Banned

Apparently Random Unsung, one of Prokofy Neva's alts, is missing from search. This is the second of her alts to be banned in the past week.

Cyberstalking Rodney

Prok has continued her cyberstalking, this time she's AGAIN attacking Rodney Linden aka Rodney Caston, well known anime creator (Mega Tokyo), and friend to /b/tards everywhere.

She and her droogs can't seem to agree whether she is net-stalking a nobody or attacking a public figure.

Prokanista cult member brinda Allen says:

"Hmm...I did see Rodney Linden at an info hub... {not Ross btw...Hanja or Ahern i think} and wondered why he was there. Obviously he's allowed any avie he chooses..just seems a lil creepy that he's in a outfit that seems violent looking. I would think a certain amount of professionalism in attire would be appropriate."

Posted by: brinda allen |

I am sure in Prok's world of John Birch Societies and Rotary Club meetings, Linden Lab would force all their employees to wear ejackets and eties on their avies like good corporate drones. They wisely don't because LL doesnt pay their people enough to make them suffer that way in RL, never mind in SL.

Either way, Prok's insulting an increasing number of people day after day. She has most recently banned all users of third party clients from her land, in a rather lulzy spaz attack, a virtual business an hero on full display. We predict her occupancy rate will crater and she will leave SL land business within a few months.

Meet the Real Prok: Super Sekrit Spai

Fast Company Bio of Prokofy/Catherine A Fitzpatrick

Seeing the lulz emanating from the epileptic fits of bawww seen on Prok's blog the past few weeks, particularly with her rather rude dragging of RL into things in her libelous attacks upon IntLibber, we felt it meet to /r/ Prok more deeply. Working from what we know about her:

RL Name: Catherine A Fitzpatrick
Skills: Translates Russian (badly, according to natives), bawwwing about human rights while being a shill for the foreign policies of a tyrannical regime with a history of abusing human rights, while at the same time attacking that regime (We mean the Bush Administration, not Linden Lab), tendency to jargon, word salad, newspeak, and seeing leninist conspiracies everywhere. Staunch anticommunist/Ayn Rand fan, but hearty endorser of New Deal politics and neosocialism.
Location: East Side, Manhattan, NYC
Past: Something to do with the United Nations

After much searching, we found in her own self-written Fast Company bio, that Ms Fitzpatricks trail is first found with the International League for Human Rights, which claims to be the oldest human rights organization in the US but was an offshoot of the ACLU by intelligence service related attorneys during the Red Scare era of the 1920's. Her father may have been a power attorney in DC with a history in the State Department and diplomatic (i.e. selling out to foreign powers) lobbying.

Fitzpatrick's time with the ILHR dates from sometime between 1998 and 2002, in which she was the program director for former Soviet States, and her name is on documents about various UN human rights conferences representing her NGO proudly. She seems to have developed a strong mistrust of central asian post-soviet states in this time period as just a bunch of thugs who dont change without a lot of heavy bribery and heavy handedness, and worked closely with the Bush Administration in negotiating more recognition of human rights in these thugocracies. She seems to have contrasted this sort of diplomacy through bribery from the typical sort seen with, say, South Africa, which will bend over for some AIDS aid.

Then in 2003 she went to work for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty as an "editor" (i.e. Propaganda/Disinfo Agent), evidently being involved in Bush administration propaganda campaigns in Europe against those cheese-eating surrender monkeys, France, and of course not saying much about Spain's cowardly withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan over a few bombings that brought the internationalist socialists into office.

For those in the know, Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty are propaganda radio stations operated by the CIA officially since 1969, and unofficially through channels since 1972. Yup, Prok is a CIA propaganda/disinformation agent.

So why would she claim to be uninsured, is that disinfo to serve her new masters in the Obama administration and their quest to force everyone into nationalized health care? Perhaps she was given a "Burn Notice" in years past, like in the TV show when she went off the ranch with inane rantings about leninist conspiracies inside The Company? Did they retire her to Bellevue Hospital on mental disability? Perhaps instead she was reassigned by the CIA to be a FUD Propaganda/Disinfo Agent in SL? This would explain her attacking Linden Lab and demands for government controls in SL. She could simply be seeking to stir up a large enough dramastorm to justify more government in SL?

We don't know exactly. We know her Fast Company bio does indicate she has NOT terminated her employment with this CIA propaganda mouthpiece. So she likely does still work for the government intelligence agency in some capacity, despite her claims to the contrary and claims to be uninsured (yet if she was operating undercover, which of course would be illegal for a CIA asset to operate in the US, she would have to be officially uninsured to be plausible, so even that would fit).

All we can tell is that we now know why Prok is such a big-government New Dealer, anti-communist pro-war-on-eterror whackjob: She's a government plant here in SL, spreading FUD and lies, or else the tired and exhausted husk of a former spai who is now mentally disabled.

It also explains why she hates IntLibber with such a passion: IntLibber, before joining SL, was apparently a well known Libertarian activist, Vice-Chair of the LP of New Hampshire, Free State Project member, and one of the few people in the past decade to peacefully and legally bop Big Brother a big one on the nose a few times (Killington, VT secession; Eminent Domaining Supreme Court Justices Homes, etc etc). Nothing makes Big Brother more angry than being made a fool of by one man or a small group.

She also apparently agrees with the neo-luddite movement organized on the right by CIA shill Francis Fukuyama, and on the left by Bill McKibben and Theresa Heinz-Kerry as well as faux-secessionist/luddite Kirkpatrick Sale. Left anarchists like Sale have been trying to take over the right-leaning Free State Project in New Hampshire for several years, to make it part of his Second Vermont Republic project to secede all of Northern New England from the US. Attacking a noted FSP leader would be part and parcel of such a campaign by an ally of Sale.

Another curious contraindication: In the 1990's she worked for George Soros' Open Society Institute, yet she is a raving opponent of openness: anti-Open-Source, anti-Open-Information, totally against the transparency society the OSI promotes. Did she leave OSI out of philosophical conflict? Did she discover Soros is a Leninist Conspirator? Did Soros fail to give her the personal stimulus package she earnestly desired?

We now know a LOT more about Prokofy Neva, but are left with even more questions. We encourage our readers to /r/ this topic more deeply.

ITS A CONSPIRACY

It got even sillier today, with Prok declaring Woodbury a "conspiracy" and ranting further...

Prok tried to claim that Woodbury's group is joined only by invitations issued by Tizzy Teardrop, when in fact any group member can invite new members, thus the group is essentially an open join group much like her Ravenglass Rentals group. Do WE accuse her of running a conspiracy with her ranting and raving and libelous lies? Perhaps we should investigate this further.

We really do not know whether Prok simply makes alts up like "Soviet Admiral", teleports to the Woodbury sims, and asks for an invite so the can go grief her own land on the alt, and kill the chickens she so conveniently left out in the open, unprotected, on publicly accessible land. It seems far to convenient for us, really. None of us know who "Soviet Admiral" was, so it is far more plausible that the avatar is an alt of Prokofy herself. Really now, who benefits from wearing such a tag while 'griefing'? Prok does. She evidently did not care about the chickens, she apparently takes absolutely no steps as are commonly done by real chicken farmers, to protect her chickens from the public.

This is the epitome of what is commonly known as a 'false flag operation'. The only person who benefits is Prokofy, and she conveniently gets to smear Woodbury in her blog once again.

the journalism game

journalism is a way to convey information from one person(s) to another.
id like to talk to you about proper journalism discipline.

1. research your target with complete accuracy. take notes. and don't forget the main concept at hand.
2. when writing, remember to leave your biased ideas, questions and opinions at home. neutrality is the game . the only thing that is important is the absolute truth. any biased views of things causes inaccuracy's with your writing, not to mention makes readers believe that what you said was truth when all it was, was personal judgment.
3. back whatever information you have with evidence to support your claims.
4. keep the trash talk outside. being supportive to the readers wins more votes. even if there views are expressed in a negative fashion. sometimes if you read them, you may yourself, become a better writer.

now when we discuss Ms. Neva's own writing, it is none of these. in fact there is a ACTUAL writing style for her form of journalism. it is called. Gonzo journalism

Gonzo journalism is a style of journalism which is written subjectively, often including the reporter as part of the story via a First Person narrative. The style tends to blend factual and fictional elements to emphasize an underlying message and engage the reader. The word Gonzo was first used in 1970 to describe an article by Hunter S, Thompson, who later popularized the style. The term has since been applied to other subjective artistic endeavors.

Gonzo journalism tends to favor style over accuracy and often uses personal experiences and emotions to provide context for the topic or event being covered. It disregards the 'polished' edited product favored by newspaper media and strives for the gritty factor. Use of quotations, sarcasm, humor, exaggeration, and even profanity is common.

people today are gullible and will believe anything that is said in there ears. with this in mind. most people cannot tell the fiction from the non-fiction of Gonzo journalism. causing readers to believe the lies written within. using ones own biased beliefs to become factual.

With reckless abandon, or, more broadly, extreme cases such as Ms Neva's writing, a lack of research is done on the topic at hand. so that readers have to assume that all that she says is truth when anyone with a cursory knowledge of the subject realizes Ms. Neva made the whole thing up. when someone confronts her on it. she will respond in 1 of 2 ways. be true to gonzo journalism and use sarcasm, exaggeration and profanity towards the person to make there word inferior. or just simply remove them from the equation either by ban's, deletion of there comments, muteing them or when all else fails, ignoring them completely. of coarse the latter is a natural course of action of someone who learned there literary art in communist Russia when censorship was common practice at the time she got her degree.

does this mean she is a bad writer? no. it just means that reading her articles are only good for a laugh and shouldn't be taken seriously.

Chicken Little

Prok didn't attend SLCC in San Fran this year, possibly because IntLibber trolled her into believing Moot was going to attend and speak on a panel about being voted Time Magazines "Worlds Most Influential Person". However, that didn't prevent her from libelling Woodbury University with a false claim that they griefed Linden Lab's Battery Street offices today.

Here are the facts: Woodbury's Dean of the School of Media Culture and Design, working with SL FIC insider Loki Clifton, got permission from LL Chairman Philip Linden to park a party bus outside the LL offices during SLCC and ferry attendees to come do chalk art on the sidewalks and building.

Loki hired a 45 party bus complete with stripper pole, bar, live music, and light show, while WU paid for the bus, the extensive bar budget, tons of schwag given away in raffles on the bus to attendees, as well as luxury suites in the hotel for parties. The party bus was the big entertainment/social event of SLCC, with more people riding the bus than were registered for SLCC.

Folks who put their artwork in chalk on Battery Street include luminaries like artist Filthy Fluno, musician Cylindrian Rutabega, CallieDel Boa, Cid Ducatillion, Luc Aubret, Shaun Altman, IntLibber Brautigan, etc etc. Yes there were some personalities like Plastic Duck, Meif Ling, Huns Valen from W-Hat in attendance, as well as well known Woodbury folks like Tizzers Foxchase, Merato Zilz, Sangria, Cam Mitchell, etc. but really everybody was getting along fine and having fun, the way things should be. All in all, some 500+ people participated over the course of an evening in the performance art event.

Yet Prok, along with Daniel Voyager, tried to falsely portray this fun event as "griefing" and "criminal vandalism", without once contacting the organizers, or the alleged "victims", to get the facts. This is prima facie proof that Prokofy is not a legitimate journalist, does not follow standards of journalism, and is thus a griefing troll who uses her blog to attack competitors in SL and fabricates 'griefing' to blame on others for her personal status boost.

None of the three have retracted their statements, and they even falsely claimed credit for the photo seen above, which was actually taken by one of our people. Plagiarism IS journalistic and academic fraud, as well as theft of intellectual property.

Prokofy's house of cards are folding in front of our eyes. In her latest blog entry her own logic dictates that because she opposes banlink, she is a greifer. Only makes since now that she was present at 2 PN greifer raids.

In it she posts a TL;DR chatlog with various other land barons including IntLibber Brautigan who defends the BanLink system. She distorts and lies about BanLink to serve her purpose of forever getting rid of banlink so her alts can continue crashing sims on her behalf.

Travis Lambert, the founder of BanLink, defends BanLink in an eloquent rebuttal to Prokofy's holocaust denial style defamation. Prokofy, like the paranoid conspiracy theorist style mindset don't respond with logic, but with a false parellel and bitter envy.

Travis, you continue to mislead the public mightily with this invention.

When you are ready to publicize the banlists your subscribers make AND publish all their comments, that is, to make them all viewable to the general public without subscriptions, then we can believe you that the system is trustworthy.

Until then, it is a totalitarian police machine.

Posted by: Prokofy Neva | February 18, 2009 at 11:25 PM

What is truly disturbing is how she makes the claim that exposes her own fraud by attempting to defame the now reformed W-Hat group:

Aminom Marvin is in W-hat. So of course he has ever motivation in the book to oppose Ban-Link. Aminom claims he is unrelated to past W-hat griefing alts with similar names or any W-hat griefing at all, but since one of the hallmarks of the W-hat shtick is to pretend you aren't griefing when you, who knows? He's not to be trusted, even if he writes what's correct in and of itself about this infernal system.

Posted by: Prokofy Neva | February 19, 2009 at 08:49 PM

Clearly we can see her true colors. you are the greifer you claim to hate. You oppose banlink yourself while you clearly use PN style alt abuse and greifing tactics to blame W-Hat and Woodbury for your own deeds. Your own hallmark is pretending not to greif yourself. You are a liar and hypocrite and act like the Stalinist regime to say you despise.

You make me sick.

A Strange Coincidence...

Ever wondered why when Prokofy shows her ugly avatar in a social event in Second Life, greifing ensues after one of her insane paranoid rantings? Twice today I have encountered Prokofy, and twice I was griefed. That was only today!

I have received similar reports from users all over SL including some older accounts. This obvious correlation implies causation and needs to be explored more. I invite anyone who feels similarly to comment below. Also if you with to contribute evidence please contact me.

Prokofy, griefing in SL is a TOS violation. Using it to gain sympathy or to attract attention to yourself are not loop holes in the TOS.